Wise Moral Message From A Mahatrna Gandhi

Wise Moral Message From A Mahatrna Gandhi

Gandhi is one of the wise man who accidentally Wan then spread the teachings of virtue which must not be overlooked up to now. Assessment of the private Gandhi will lead to the majesty, in spite of all the differences that enclose various aspects of life of the nation, religion, and race.

There are so many life stories that until today still lasting and just being a moral lesson to anyone who ever knew

The human figure, both directly and only through said exposure through various instruments of books and other literature.

Stories will I lift an experience when he was studying in the country United Kingdom (England).

When is studying at one of the universities in the UK, there was a professor who is not so fond of self carriage and the nature of Gandhi. Call it the professor by the name of Professor John.

When the Professor were having lunch at one of the campus cafeteria, suddenly the young Gandhi to come and sit beside the professor was taking out, lunch. Seeing the Gandhi matey necessarily make Professor John furious and said: "Hey Gandhi, did you forget that pig and birds will not sit down and eat together '. Listening professor spicy like it, Gandhi was not immediately upset but remained calm and said: "quiet, sir, I'll fly." And Gandhi was soon moved from the cafeteria table "was.

Treated like that definitely makes Professor John added annoyed and furious. He promised he would reply to Gandhi when in class later.

Professor awaited moment had arrived and he was teaching in class Gandhi. Amid explanation of the professor, he put questions to Gandhi. "Hey Gandhi, if you were asked to take two boxes, one containing the money and the other contains wisdom. Box which one would you take?" Asked the professor condescendingly.

Gandhi then calmly replied, "Yes, eager for money."

The professor smiled sarcastically and said, "if I were you, then would I grab a box is a box of wisdom". Jawabaff'dzTri heard the Professor then later Gandhi said, "because someone took what he had." Suddenly then the class laughed and the Professor really embarrassed made.

Professor John promised that he would be the first ienjatuhkan Gandhi on other occasions.

And the occasion is when the test comes. When Gandhi handed over the answer sheet to the professor, he did not directly vote. But
write the word "idiot" and give it back to Gandhi.

Receive such treatment does not make Gandhi mad. The temple remained quiet read letter by letter that says the word "idiot" is. Suddenly Gandhi stood up and approached the professor, saying: "Sorry sir, the new gaffer leave a signature in my answer sheet and not vote". Suddenly then the Professor was shocked, embarrassed, and angry as hell.

Moral of the story:

# How to be humble if not treated well by people who do not like us.

Has become a norm and something natural that if you become a privileged or personal favored by many people, on the other hand do not lose many people who do not like you. The only way to deal with those who do not like you is to accept them, in the sense of accepting the mockery and criticism of them. Accepting does not mean only nod,

but be humble and give life lessons that will make them aware of yourself deserves respected.

# The Most Important is 'Not What The Fact But What Is Behind The Fact'.

'The most important thing is not what is the meaning behind all the facts but the facts'. The reason someone does not like you not because you are a prominent and respected. But because that person wants to be like you, but then not menemukt1 the right way, so the only way

is by dropping you and arouses others admitted that he was' more than you.

A reception is realized in the form of rejection. Approximately such a state that describes how Professor John disliked Gandhi. But nevertheless a reception which was formed by accentuating the rejection is the wrong perspective. That successful visits Gandhi behind the rejection of the Professor, so Gandhi using a wise way to later prove that the way in which the professor was wrong. In other words, Gandhi managed to see something that is stored behind the facts.